Posts Tagged ‘Bush’

Who I Support and Why

February 11, 2016

CTC

I am sorry I don’t have a Super PAC to blast my message incessantly over your TV set and don’t own a newspaper to trash candidates with on the front page. I am an old fifth generation resident of Arkansas who grew up in a one room house and worked from the time I was ten years old. We never had running water or a TV set at home but I never felt poor and we never received a dime’s worth of welfare. Thank God for that!

McVayHouse1949

After flying combat missions in Vietnam I returned to Arkansas ten years after I left for the military. In a five county district where “Republican” was a dirty word and in a state where only one Republican State Senator sit in the Arkansas Senate with 34 Democrats, I decided to run for State Senator 44 years ago. When I received 40% of the vote it sent shock waves across the state. With a huge voter turnout, in losing I received more votes than many of those who were elected and more than any Republican candidate for Arkansas State Senator in history. After the election I served as the youngest Republican County Chairman before accepting a federal job and getting out of politics for a couple of decades.

F-100Gene

I did come up through the ranks to become a Colonel and commander of a six billion dollar provisional wing in the Air Force before I retired.

GeneFlagDownload

Please allow me to share why I support Donald Trump for President. He is the only candidate who can turn things around in America and do it quickly. Quickly is important because I do not believe we have the luxury of kicking the can down the road one more time. If every man, woman and child in America, legal and illegal, chipped in a million dollars to prop up our country, we would still be in trouble. Being optimistic and saying America’s best days are ahead would be like a rat in a trap in the engine room of the Titanic singing “Happy Days are here Again!”

USCreditRating

The one thing I know after being an Intelligence Analyst at the National Security Agency is that countries do fail and they do it frequently. Great leadership has kept the wolf away from our door in the past but there is a drought of leadership in America at EVERY level today. The days when we could toss the mattress on top of the Model A Ford and flee the Dust Bowl for California are long gone. Californians are fleeing to Texas.

 

These are just some of the reasons I believe Trump is THE man:

★He is immune to special interest lobbying because he has accepted no donations or special interest money. No other candidate can make this claim.
★He is an executive. The President of the United States is the Chief Executive Officer of our nation. We don’t need a policy expert or a legislator – we need someone who knows how to run an organization. Mr. Trump is the only candidate who has a proven record as a successful executive on a global scale.
★He is honest. Mr. Trump is a man who tells the truth. He may not always say it in the most polished way, but our country has had enough suave liars. It is time for some straight forward honesty.
★He is decisive. As President every decision he makes would be in the best interest of the country. We hear about his having business interests that filed for bankruptcy. In each case, he looked at the situation as it was, and then he cut his losses. We need someone who will look at government programs realistically and stop funding them if they are failures. Government waste is legendary!

Megyn
★He is courageous. Mr. Trump has been viciously attacked by the Washington establishment and the media – and he has not budged one inch. In other words, he is willing to take charge and lead.
★He listens. At Trump Presidential events, the audience gets to actually speak to him without being screened, and he responds without a teleprompter.

can9
★His success is unmatched in the business world by all the others. There is a difference between being elected Governor or Senator and fitting into an organization that has been operating for centuries versus risking YOUR own money and building YOUR OWN business from the ground up through thick and thin. Simply put: Governors and Senators HAVE NO SKIN IN THE GAME, PERIOD!
★Having intelligence and an IQ of 157, we don’t see bewildered stares from Trump like we see in other candidates.
★Before running for president, Trump was ranked the 45th most recognizable person in the world above President Obama, Pope Francis, Henry Ford and even Cleopatra.
★He wrote 10 best-selling books including “The Art of the Deal” that was a number 1 best seller and remained on the New York Times Best Seller list for 51 weeks.
★He does business worldwide and knows the leaderS and understands the cultures.
★His businesses include construction, media, manufacturing, travel, entertainment and publishing.
★He’s a job producer and, just for the record, most of his CEO’s are women who are paid as much or more than men.
★He gives millions to charities. When he raised $6 million in Iowa for Vets, $1 million was his own money.
★He understands currency manipulation, money exchanges, inflation, deflation worldwide wages and HOW TO COMPETE.
★His tax program 0-10-15-25 is simple. One reason government is so complicated is to justify more unionized bureaucrats.
★His universal interstate medical insurance program is very realistic and allows for actual competition. Bean counters make more than Surgeons in our upside down Obamacare.

can5
★He has a good five point immigration program.
★He’s pro military & strongly supports our Veterans to the degree he will take ISIS oil fields to take care of our Vets if necessary.
★He will build a wall and seal off the boarder. He built a 96 story building; have any of the other candidates ever built ANYTHING, even a dog house? He understands that a nation without borders and language that refuses to enforce its own laws is not a nation at all.

Iran
★He’s anti-Iran deal and pro-Israel. The DEAL states we have to protect Iran if Israel attacks while Iran keeps saying they are going to wipe Israel and us off of the map.

MaoXmas
★His pro Christmas stance stands in stark contrast to the Democrats who booed God at the DNC and Obama who placed a Mao ornament on the White House HOLIDAY Tree.
★He also realizes that our nation is being trashed worldwide and speaks up about it.
★He recognizes the China money manipulation policy which is anti-USA.
★ He says that Japan’s tariff on US goods is one way deal making.
★He wants to put a tariff on Mexican goods and cut off aid.
★Remember when Trump said; we protect Saudi Arabia therefore they must pay.
★We fought for Afghanistan while spending billions to help those people; now China is mining their minerals because the Obama administration is incompetent and populated with stupid leaders.

RecruitingOffice
★He wants a high tech world class military instead of a military that is not allowed to even defend itself.
★He realizes we have a Muslin problem in this nation.
★He thinks Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud pointing to his SS#, no draft card, old pass port, E-verification status, SEALED school records and scholarships only available to foreign students.
★He will work for one dollar per year salary, give the rest to charity and not accept the pension after his presidency if elected.

★The greatest thing Donald will do for our economy is slash regulations and taxes so our companies can come home and compete on an even keel.  Simply put, he will take the government boots off the necks of Americans.

Donald J. Trump is not trying to win a popularity contest or fill a Pulpit in a Church. You and I can probe his past and find something with which we disagree. We can do the very same thing with the Apostle Paul who persecuted Christians before he became a Christian.

There is not a day that goes by when I don’t hear the media twisting, spinning or outright lying about something Trump or another candidate said.

TrumpStand

The media is accustomed to telling us what we should think and who we should vote for. The media is gnashing teeth and renting clothes as their power is draining out of their tiny skulls. If everybody spent as little as Trump spends on his campaign, more media would go bankrupt.

The Puppet Candidates normally skyrocket to the top while the media French kisses them on national TV. THAT AIN’T HAPPENING FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY! Trump may not be conservative enough or Christian enough for some but being conservative won’t mean anything if we don’t have a country to be conservative in. Are you going to waste your vote on a Business As Usual candidate or are you ready to help MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?

Advertisements

DID THE IOWA CAUCUSES MEAN ANYTHING!

October 27, 2015

But, are the Iowa Caucuses much ado about nothing?

IowaC

In 1976, Gerald Ford defeated Ronald Reagan before being defeated by Jimmy Carter in the General Election. Ford Was not elected Vice President, he had been appointed by President Nixon after Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned in light of a scandal that implicated him in receiving illegal bribes as Governor of Maryland, imagine that!

In 1980, Ronald Reagan lost Iowa a second time, this time to George “Read My Lips” H.W. Bush. Reagan lost Iowa but went on to defeat Jimmy Carter with 489 electoral votes to 49. Turns out, Iowa was not much of a predictor of things to come.

Last time the 99 counties in Iowa Caucused, Rick “Who” Santorum was pronounced winner and before that, “Big Government” Huckabee floated to the top.

In 2004, George W. Bush was unopposed after winning in 2000 with 41% over Steve Forbes (31%), Alan Keyes (14%), Gary Bauer (9%), John McCain (5%), and Orrin Hatch (1%). The Iowa residents did figure out John McCain, the Hanoi Songbird who made at least 32 anti American propaganda broadcasts for the Viet Cong and reportedly designed the air defense system for Hanoi.

Most Americans still think McCain was tortured when all of his injuries were caused by his low altitude ejection. In fact, McCain was treated like royalty and received treatment at the best hospital in Hanoi where NO OTHER POW EVER received treatment. The top POW, Colonel Ted Guy was preparing charges against McCain when Nixon pardoned him. Other POWs, who did not collaborate with the enemy, sought to bring these things to light until they died with little or no success. John McCain received preferential treatment as the son of the Four Star Admiral who commanded the Pacific Fleet. Kudos to the good people of Iowa for figuring this out.

Here is a quote from VETERANS TODAY: “If our news media can go thru a presidential election hiding all of this from the American people, nearly putting someone like this in office, what else are they capable of? What else have they done? What else are they hiding?

Vietnam veterans are requesting that the records of the debriefing of all POWS be made public. Those who were heroes need real recognition and shouldn’t have to hide behind a presidential pardon they never needed or wanted.

Those who betrayed their country, some to sit in public office, on corporate boards or to travel around the country basking in glory and pointing fingers at others need to get the homecoming they earned. We spent the last 35 years honoring ALL the POWs while 58,000 dead and another 200,000 plus dying were neglected and abused, denied jobs, denied medical care and hated by their fellow Americans.”
***
In 1988 Bob Dole won Iowa with Pat Robertson second and George H.W. Bush, the eventual winner, coming in third 18 points behind Dole.

In 1992, George “Read My Lips” H. W. Bush was unopposed before handing the keys to the White House to Billy “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” Clinton. Billy Clinton more than doubled the electoral votes received by Bush 370 to 168. The popular vote looked like this: Clinton 44,909,806, Bush 39,104,550 and Ross Perot 19,743,821. In a two way race, it is not hard to figure out who would have won with either Bush or Perot versus Clinton. Clinton didn’t exactly WOW the Iowa Democrats who picked Tom Harkin by 76% in ‘92. Clinton finished fourth like this: “Uncommitted” (12%), Paul Tsongas (4%), Bill Clinton (3%).

There is a lot of criticism against the Iowa Caucuses, especially the Democratic version. Democratic caucus participants must publicly state their opinion and vote, leading to natural problems such as peer pressure from neighbors and embarrassment over who his or her preferred candidate might be. This is a tactic Democrats want to use to taint Union elections. On the other hand, Republicans use the Secret Ballot in Iowa. Another criticism involves the amount of participants’ time these events consume. Participants are often required to listen to long ranting speeches from local political leaders.

An Iowa caucus can last around two hours, preventing people who must work, who are sick, or who must take care of their children from casting their vote. ABSENTEE VOTING IS ALSO BARRED, SO ACTIVE-DUTY IOWAN SOLDIERS LOSE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE, AS DO LOCALLY-REGISTERED COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO LEAVE THE STATE DURING WINTER HOLIDAYS. The final criticism is the complexity of the rules in terms of how one’s vote counts, as it is not a simple popular vote.

Iowa is a great state with great people but do the Iowa Caucus results actually reflect the will of those people?

Another factor in Iowa is The Des Moines Register, the largest daily Iowa newspaper with a circulation of 85,000. The Register called for Donald Trump to drop out of the race and, like most liberal media, has hit Trump with one barrage after another. So much so that Trump barred the Register from a campaign event; they showed up anyway.

 

By now people are wondering what just happend in Iowa?  The Democrats claim the final tally was 50% to 50% with the guy who dropped out getting 1%.  Gee, that’s 101%.  Then there is the coin flipping to decide who gets the undecided vote.  Seems like, defying all the odds, Hillary won six of six coin tosses.  I defy YOU to flip a coin six times and get it right 100% of the time.

Without a secret ballot, the Iowa results mean nothing to me.  With a secret ballot where nobody knows who you voted for, a fair election is possible.  That’s why unions hate private ballots because they cannot intimidate and threaten members.  Bosses can’t tell employees to caucus with them or else.

So Iowa is history but some candidates have a bad taste in their mouths.

CarsonCruz

 

NEW WORLD ORDER (Part 1)

July 14, 2014

 

~~~~~~~NWO

I can put words on paper but I can’t make you read. The mere mention of a phrase is enough to make people’s brains slam shut and their eyes roll back into their skulls. Maybe that’s why it is written in Latin on the reverse of the dollar bill, “Novus Ordo Seclorum.” I wish I could give you a sound bite or talking point but this is way too deep and intertwined for that. Stick with me, you won’t regret it.

My fellow Americans, call it what you wish, New World Order, One World Government or Novus Ordo Seclorum, it is going to happen and we cannot stop it. Maybe we can slow it down a little but an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elites, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe dominated by the British Crown whose goal is to create a One World Government that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 5.5 Billion people. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.

The Idea of a New World Order (NWO) is embraced by more people in America than you can imagine. Before you jump on the bandwagon, let me give you some facts that will make you think twice: There will be no middle class, only rulers and their servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited. Your wealth will be worthless because you cannot buy or sell unless you have what the Bible calls, “the mark of the beast.” In Biblical terms, “Beast” means “Government.”

Yes, the Bible indicates that One World Government under the Antichrist will exist during the end times. Who better to enlighten us but Daniel himself. Jesus quoted Daniel, King Darius trusted Daniel but was tricked into a decree that placed Daniel in the lions’ den. In the end, God protected him and restored Daniel to favor under Darius and the Persian King who followed him, King Cyrus. Daniel wrote:
“Thus he said: ‘As for the fourth beast, there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and it shall devour the whole earth, and trample it down, and break it to pieces.” Daniel 7:23

Daniel 8:23: “And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.

“Understanding Dark Sentences” is descriptive of the secret organizations and phrases like the New World Order and fundimental transformation. All of the things that stand in the way of the NWO are crumbling including Patriotism, Freedom of Religion, gun ownership, the Constitution, National Security, Border Security, respect for laws, education choice, traditional values and a strong military that supports the people. If you get your news from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and NPR you are unaware of any of this.

Walter Cronkite, the late CBS anchorman and broadcast icon often referred to as “the most trusted man in America,” Made this statement in a 1999 speech to the World Federalist Association, one of the oldest and foremost organizations promoting world government:

“It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order…. We cannot defer this responsibility to posterity. Democracy, civilization itself, is at stake. Within the next few years we must change the basic structure of our global community from the present anarchic system of war … to a new system governed by a democratic U.N. federation.”

The reason it was imperitive that Barack Obama be reelected at all costs is because the world has an important place for him in the New World Order. It was so important that thousands and thousands of dead people, illegal aliens and phantom voters flocked to the polls in his support. Sometimes there were more voters than registered voters and 100% of them voted for President Obama. Nobody raised an eyebrow, as usual.

We must go back to the early 1900s and Cecil Rhodes, who advocated that the British Empire and the United States should jointly impose a Federal World Government to bring about lasting world “peace”. Yes, Rhodes founded the Rhodes Scholarship as a global brotherhood of future leaders.

Apart from smoking dope (and not inhaling) as a Rhodes Scholar, Clinton shared a
house at 46 Leckford Road with Frank Aller, Strobe Talbot and David Satter. They did what they could to oppose the Vietnam War in those days. Clinton spoke of helping arrange a ‘teach-in’ in London. He also, according to another contemporary, Richard McSorley, helped to organise a demonstration outside the US embassy.

Frank Aller was another draft dodger like clinton. Clinton called Frank “one of the bravest, best men I know,” in his famous letter to an R.O.T.C. director in Arkansas explaining why he had given up his own thoughts of resistance to safeguard his “political viability.”

Over winter vacation of 1969-1970, Clinton toured Moscow, where he had been preceded by his roommate Strobe Talbott. Talbott was then translating the memoirs of former Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, which had been leaked to him by Victor Louis, a KGB disinformation agent and talent spotter. Frank Aller was doing similar work on the unpublished notes of Edgar Snow, an American journalist believed to be the first Western journalist to interview Mao Zedong.

Strobe Talbott became Deputy Secretary of State for President Clinton, and later president of the very influential think tank, the Brookings Institution, in Washington, D.C. In a highly acclaimed essay published in Time Magazine in 1992, entitled “The Birth of the Global Nation,” Talbott declared:

“In 1795 Kant advocated a peaceful league of democracies. But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government… Federalism has already proved the most successful of all political experiments, and organizations like the World Federalist Association have for decades advocated it as the basis for global government.”

David Satter became the Moscow correspondent of the Financial Times of London. He then became a special correspondent on Soviet affairs of The Wall Street Journal. He is currently a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a fellow of the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. He has been a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and a visiting professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In December 2013 the Russian government expelled him from the country with the official reason being that he was “guilty of multiple gross violations of Russian migration law.”

Who knows what Frank Aller would have become but Frank committed suicide in 1971 — in despair, his friends say, over a decision that had ruined his life.

“I hoped that the spectacle of young men refusing to fight would somehow ‘move the conscience of America’ ” is how Aller explained himself in a Nov. 5, 1970, letter to a friend in New York City. Clinton had left Oxford for Yale Law School. Aller had stayed in England, a fugitive from justice. “The problem is that,” he wrote, “while the exile goes on and on and on, the effect does not.”

Clearly, these young men were not reading the Bible or the Federalist Papers at Oxford. “We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…” Bill Clinton was quoted as saying. (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

Those who hated the Vietnam War so much like Clinton, Aller and John Kerry did not hate it enough to become Republicans. Instead they clung to the party that got us into the Vietnam War and kept us in the War while preventing us from winning the War.

Lionel Curtis founded the Rhodes-Milner Round Table Groups in 1909, which led to the establishment of the British-based Royal Institute for International Affairs in 1919 and the U.S.-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in 1921. Edward Mandell House founded the CFR. Colonel House as he was called, was not only President Woodrow Wilson’s most prominent aide, he also actually dominated the President. Woodrow Wilson referred to House as “my alter ego” (my other self), and it is totally accurate to say that House, not Wilson, was the most powerful individual in our nation during the Wilson Administration, from 1913 until 1921. Colonel House never served in the military. Woodrow Wilson was a leader of the Progressive Movement, he served as President of Princeton University from 1902 to 1910, and was Governor of New Jersey from 1911 to 1913. He led his Democratic Party to win control of both the White House and Congress for the first time since Grover Cleveland’s victory in 1892.

I should mention here that presidents seem to need someone like Colonel House just as the Romanovs needed Grigori Rasputin. Barack Obama’s Rasputin is Valerie Jarrett, the Iranian born Senior Advisor to the President. The man who pulled George Bush’s strings was Karl Rove who had an overpowering presence and influence. Rove is a big government Republican who would eliminate the Tea Party and other small government constitutionalists in GOP primaries because of alleged fears that they lose general elections. In spite of Rove’s best efforts along with Mike Huckabee and Rick Perry, small government constitutionalist Ted Cruz did win the general election. The House Majority Leader also learned that Rove’s work does not guaranty success.

Today, the CFR is considered to be the nation’s most influential foreign-policy think tank. Its membership has included senior politicians, more than a dozen Secretaries of State, CIA directors, bankers, lawyers, professors, and senior media figures. The CFR regularly convenes meetings at which government officials, global business leaders and prominent members of the intelligence/foreign-policy community discuss major international issues. The council also publishes the bi-monthly journal Foreign Affairs, and runs a think tank called the David Rockefeller Studies Program, which influences foreign policy by making recommendations to the presidential administration and diplomatic community, testifying before Congress, interacting with the media, and authoring books, reports, articles, and op-eds on foreign policy issues.

“The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the US an official part of it.” ~Dan Smoot, former member of FBI headquarters staff

I want you to read some quotes so you can get beyond the idea that all this is just some wacky conspirency theory:

“Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” – Woodrow Wilson

* * *

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”– U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House

* * *

“Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.”
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times

***

“From the days of Sparticus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and
Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”–Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922

* * *

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the
scenes.”– Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court

* * *

“I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election….It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!” –George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress in 1957.

* * *

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…”
Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

* * *

“After their recent exposures in Bavaria, The Illuminati had been driven even further underground, taking on a variety of names, such as The French Revolutionary Club. As radicals flocked into these new varieties of Illuminism, a larger meeting hall was needed. The Hall of the Jacobins Convent was leased, and it was from this hall that they eventually derived their new name, the Jacobin Club. The Jacobin Club met in secret and eventually boasted of having some of the best-educated and most influential men in France among its 1,300 members. The Jacobins vowed to destroy the monarchy, as well as other existing institutions, and sought to establish what they called a ‘New World Order’, or ‘Universal Republic’.”

“The famous magician and occultist, Cagliostro, was initiated into the Illuminati in 1783. Many years later, he told Catholic priests about his initiation. The initiation took place in an underground room near Frankfort, Germany.”
– William T. Still, New World Order
1700’s

* * *

“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” — Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

* * *

“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” — M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

* * *

“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.”
Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book “International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World” (1931)

* * *

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939)

* * *

“National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing a new world order.”
Adolf Hitler during World War II

* * *

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.'”
— excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in the New York Times
(October 1940)

* * *

… “IN ORDER to achieve the final aim – which is one world, and not two hostile worlds – such a partial world Government must never act as an alliance against the rest of the world. The only real step toward world government is world Government itself.”
Open Letter to the General Assembly of the United Nations, 1947

* * *

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether
World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

* * *

“The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of US sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government”.
Chester Ward, Rear Admiral and former Navy Judge Advocate 1956 – 1960 and CFR member for 15 years

* * *

“The United Nations, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'”
Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — New York Times (February 1962)

* * *

“Who can fail to see the need and importance of thus gradually coming to the establishment of a world authority capable of taking effective action on the juridical and political planes? Delegates to international organizations, public officials, gentlemen of the press, teachers and educators–all of you must realize that you have your part to play in the construction of a new world order.”
Pope Paul VI in his Populorum Progressio, March 26, 1967

* * *

“All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER.”
Robert Kennedy, former U.S. Attorney-General, 1967.

* * *

“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”
Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

* * *

“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government’….National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…”
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.

* * *

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.”
David Rockefeller

* * *

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

* * *

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”
(Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

* * *

“Fidel Castro finger waving in the air and angry fist thumping the lectern, demanded a ‘new world order’ and dressed down the United States today for ‘aggressive’ and ‘exploitative’ policies around the world.”
Associated Press Report, Oct 12 1979, at the United Nations

* * *

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.”
Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

* * *

“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.”
Richard Gephardt, in the Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

* * *

“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.”
President George H.W. Bush (January 1991)

* * *

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

* * *

June 22, 1993 In case there is any doubt about whether President Clinton(CFR) supports world government, on this date he signs a letter to the World Federalist Association congratulating Strobe Talbott(CFR) on receiving the WFA’s first “Norman Cousins Global Governance Award.” The WFA is a leading force for world federal government. Clinton’s letter states: “Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government…Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition….He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes….for future success.”

* * *

Concerning whether U.S. troops should remain in Somalia as part of a U.N. operation, a pullout would be “devastating to our hopes for the new world order and our ability to participate in multinational organizations to deal with problems like this.”
General Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, September 9, 1993

* * *

“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.”
David Rockefeller, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994.

* * *

The “new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.”
Nelson Mandela, in the Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

* * *

“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order… it cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it’s perceptions.”
Henry Kissinger when campaigning for the passage of NAFTA at the World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994

* * *

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

* * *

“The world needs a ‘new world order,’ and I am here to alert you that we are entering a period of world disorder.”
George Soros at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, Jan 27, 1995

* * *

“There is a chance for the President of the United States to use this (9-11) disaster to carry out … a new world order.” Gary Hart, at a televised meting organized by the CFR in Washington, D.C. Sept 14. 2001

I’m not making this stuff up. We have yet to scratch the surface of this demonic plan that will lead to death and destruction of those lemmings who so fervently support it and the rest of us who don’t. Even well meaning conservatives are too easily distracted by a series of scandals and calamities while the one-worlders continue making hay 24/7. They keep their eyes on the prize while conservatives quibble with each other about grammar or who is more conservative. The mainstream media supports the NWO hook, line and sinker. Don’t expect them to expose the plan. In NWO Part 2, I will get into the United Nations Venezuela Conference where they passed Agenda 21 which the elder President Bush publicly gave his support to. It refered to something called “Sustainable Development” can that be a dark sentence mentioned by Daniel?

Do You Know the Presidential Contender?

January 31, 2014

~~~~~~~~Huckabee

 

Mike Huckabee is making noise again about running for President and a poll mentioned by Fox and Friends this morning has him leading with Jeb Bush and Chris Christie second and third. He has the gift of gab and loves to talk about restoring America’s Greatness. Most of us here in Arkansas would be happy if our state was restored to the condition it was in before his pitiful reign.

Mike Huckabee hilariously claimed that he would base part of the decision on whether to run for president on how his book sold. The returns are in and his book has bombed according to USA Today. Make no mistake, Huckabee still has his fawning fans who only know what he says, not what he actually does. In his get-even book, Huckabee blasts Mitt Romney, his principal rival in Iowa.

Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.” He notes that Romney declined to make a congratulatory phone call after Huckabee beat the odds to win the Iowa caucuses, “which we took as a sign of total disrespect.” He mocks Romney for suggesting, during one debate, more investment in high-yield stocks as a solution to economic woes. “Let them eat stocks!” Huckabee jokes. I believe Romney and Huckabee are both woefully lacking in conservative credentials.

As governor of Arkansas, Huckabee dramatically increased state spending. During his two-term tenure, spending increased by more than 65 percent. The number of government workers increased by 20 percent, and the state’s debt services increased by nearly $1 billion. The annual state budget in those days was about $3 billion. Huckabee financed his spending binge with higher taxes. Under his leadership, the average Arkansan’s tax burden increased 47 percent, according to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, including increases in the state’s gas, sales, income, and cigarette taxes. He raised taxes on everything from groceries to nursing home beds. Huckabee had said he would eliminate sales tax on groceries during the campaign. A Democratic State Senator introduced a Bill to do just that but Huckabee fought the Bill tooth and nail. Keep in mind that Arkansas is a poor state with per capita income at the very bottom of the barrel. By the time Huckabee was finished, Arkansas had the highest per capita taxes in the South. At this time his supporters will say, “Yeah but he is such a sweet righteous man!”

On its annual governor’s report card, The Cato Institute gave Huckabee an “F” for fiscal policy during his final term, and an overall two-term grade of “D.” Only four governors had worse scores, and 15 Democratic governors got higher grades, including well-known liberals like Ted Kulongoski of Oregon, Rod Blagojevich of Illinois, and Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania. That’s right, Blago did a better job handling money and he’s in prison. But Huck’s Army members still dote over the jolly old fellow who lost 120 pounds, wrote a book about losing 120 pounds and then put all the weight back on. He has not written a book about putting the weight back on yet, maybe we can look forward to that in the future?

Huckabee was, incidentally, the only Republican candidate for president who opposed school choice. He is proud of his record in Education. Most politicians promise to improve Education. After attending the National Governor’s Association Convention Huckabee learned about his state and sent out an e-letter saying, “some startling statistics last year… took my breath away.” The fact that these statistics were breath-taking to the governor made me catch my breath as well. You see, the Governor has, for 10 years, been pushing educational reforms (to the tune of $1 billion in just his last three years as governor) but did not know what the college remediation and dropout rates were in Arkansas and the nation. He was shocked to learn that ” twenty percent of Arkansas ninth graders do not stay in school until graduation …and more than 50 percent of Arkansas students who go straight to college require remedial courses in both math and English.” I have always said that Education is not about money, it is about learning. Huckabee might have been better off buying magic beans with that extra billion dollars?

Arkansas’ Ethics Commission admonished Mike Huckabee for violations five times, once for taking money from an organization whose donors have never been listed. Here are the most serious violations:

• $43,150 from his lieutenant governor’s campaign for use of his personal airplane. As I recall he rented his campaign his own airplane at a rate much higher than a plane could be rented from any Rental Company.

• $14,000 Janet Huckabee received from his U.S. Senate campaign, and

• $23,500 from a tax-exempt organization he incorporated with others, but whose funding source isn’t known. The Action America organization, Huckabee said, was set up to coordinate parts of his private-sector speaking schedule during his three years as lieutenant governor.

He jokingly attributed his weight loss to a “concentration camp” diet and once called Arkansas a “banana republic.”

Huckabee lashed out after reporters questioned wedding-gift registries set up to furnish his new $525,000 home in North Little Rock. The wedding account was set up for Mike Huckabee and his wife Janet, who have been married since 1974.

Huckabee has called for increased federal spending on a variety of programs from infrastructure to health care. He wants more energy subsidies, including, naturally, more subsidies for ethanol. In fact, he supports increased agricultural subsidies generally. He is the only Republican candidate who opposes President Bush’s veto of the Democrats’ proposed expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, and he is skeptical of most conservative proposals for entitlement reform. Calling himself “a different kind of Republican,” Huckabee often appears to be channeling John Edwards or Lou Dobbs. He rails against high corporate profits and attacks free trade agreements. As governor, he raised the minimum wage and increased business regulations. He says it is “a biblical duty” to pass more regulation to fight global warming.

Perhaps Huckabee’s only claim on conservative credentials is that as a former Baptist minister, he is more anti-abortion and anti-gay than the other candidates. In many ways, he has been running an overtly religion-based campaign. But even here, his preference is to increase and centralize federal government power. Unlike Fred Thompson, John McCain, or Ron Paul, Huckabee rejects federalist solutions to these issues and would have the federal government overrule state abortion and marriage laws. What other candidate for President could go to Iowa and preach in local Baptist Churches. That, of course, would not be campaigning. Huckabee raised taxes in Arkansas, not Iowa.

Under the Bush administration, the Republican Party increasingly drifted away from its limited government roots. It has come to be dominated by a new breed of conservatives who believe in increasing the size, cost and power of government to achieve “conservative ends,” even if that means limiting personal freedom in the process. Bush brought us No Child Left Behind, the Medicare prescription drug benefit, and a 23-percent increase in domestic discretionary spending, and Huckabee’s been right there with him.

On election night in 2006, 55 percent of voters leaving the polls said they believed the Republican Party had become the party of big government. Mike Huckabee is doing his best to convert the other 45 percent.

Mitt Romney, Huckabee’s principal rival in Iowa, receives the roughest treatment. Huckabee writes that the former Massachusetts governor’s record was “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president.” He notes that Romney declined to make a congratulatory phone call after Huckabee beat the odds to win the Iowa caucuses, “which we took as a sign of total disrespect.” He mocks Romney for suggesting, during one debate, more investment in high-yield stocks as a solution to economic woes. “Let them eat stocks!” Huckabee jokes.

His treatment of former candidate Fred Thompson, a rival who helped sink Huckabee’s upstart ambitions in South Carolina, is somewhat more favorable, if only because it is less personal. Huckabee maintains that Thompson’s biggest mistake was strategic: he didn’t understand the need to expand the Republican Party beyond its base. “Fred Thompson never did grasp the dynamics of the race or the country, and his amazingly lackluster campaign reflected just how disconnected he was with the people, despite the anticipation and expectation that greeted his candidacy,” Huckabee writes.
Many conservative Christian leaders — who never backed Huckabee, despite their holding similar stances on social issues — are spared neither the rod nor the lash. Huckabee writes of Gary Bauer, the conservative Christian leader and former presidential candidate, as having an “ever-changing reason to deny me his support.” Of one private meeting with Bauer, Huckabee says, “It was like playing Whac-a-Mole at the arcade — whatever issue I addressed, another one surfaced as a ‘problem’ that made my candidacy unacceptable.” He also accuses Bauer of putting national security before bedrock social issues like the sanctity of life and traditional marriage.

Huckabee describes other elders of the social-conservative movement, many of whom meet in private as part of an organization called the Arlington Group, as “more enamored with the process, the political strategies, and the party hierarchy than with the simple principles that had originally motivated the Founders.” Later, Huckabee writes, “I lamented that so many people of faith had moved from being prophetic voices — like Naaman, confronting King David in his sin and saying, ‘Thou art the man!’ — to being voices of patronage, and saying to those in power, ‘You da’ man!’ ”

He calls out Pat Robertson, the Virginia-based televangelist, and Dr. Bob Jones III, chancellor of Bob Jones University in South Carolina, for endorsing Rudy Giuliani and Romney, respectively. He also has words for the Texas-based Rev. John Hagee, who endorsed the more moderate John McCain in the primaries, as someone who was drawn to the eventual Republican nominee because of the lure of power. Huckabee says he spoke to Hagee by phone before the McCain endorsement while preparing for a spot on Saturday Night Live. “I asked if he had prayed about this and believed this was what the Lord wanted him to do,” Huckabee writes of the conversation. “I didn’t get a straight answer.” Months later, McCain rejected Hagee’s endorsement because of controversial remarks the pastor had made about biblical interpretations.

In a chapter titled “Faux-Cons: Worse than Liberalism,” Huckabee identifies what he calls the “real threat” to the Republican Party: “libertarianism masked as conservatism.” He is not so much concerned with the libertarian candidate Ron Paul’s Republican supporters as he is with a strain of mainstream fiscal-conservative thought that demands ideological purity, seeing any tax increase as apostasy and leaving little room for government-driven solutions to people’s problems. “I don’t take issue with what they believe, but the smugness with which they believe it,” writes Huckabee, who raised some taxes as governor and cut deals with his state’s Democratic legislature. “Faux-Cons aren’t interested in spirited or thoughtful debate, because such an endeavor requires accountability for the logical conclusion of their argument.” Among his targets is the Club for Growth, a group that tarred Huckabee as insufficiently conservative in the primaries and ran television ads with funding from one of Huckabee’s longtime Arkansas political foes, Jackson T. Stephens Jr.

The national media gets no pardon either. “Reporters facilitate the greedy and grubby process whereby too many elections go to the highest bidder and his sharpie hirelings,” he writes. He remains sore about the degree to which a candidate’s credibility is judged by his or her bank account and notes that during the debates, he was often asked about religion while the other candidates dealt with questions of government policy. Why, he asks, was a “floating cross” in the window of one of his ads such a media controversy when reporters gave a pass to a Barack Obama direct-mail piece that obviously photographed the Democrat before a large Christian cross?

But for all the sharp words Huckabee has for his fellow Republicans, score-settling is not the major thrust of the book, Huckabee’s sixth. Rather, Huckabee, who now hosts a weekend show on Fox News, spends most of the pages celebrating the grass-roots success of his surprisingly successful campaign and laying out, again, his vision for the future of the Republican Party, which includes instituting a national sales tax to replace the income tax and renewed focus on health-care prevention and education. He mentions McCain only in passing, and with praise, calling him a “true statesman and a man of honor.”

Huckabee also has some fun along the way. We learn that the actor Chuck Norris, a prominent Huckabee supporter, actually does use the Total Gym at home. (Norris hawks the Total Gym in a well-known late-night infomercial.) In the middle of a disquisition on libertarianism, Huckabee pauses to praise the musician Cher for tours that are “an amazing blend of rock concert, circus and fashion show.”

He also returns again and again to stories of his supporters, like the woman who gave him her wedding ring on a rope line in Michigan because she could not afford to make a contribution to his campaign and the truck driver who appeared on his behalf at public rallies. “I was only carrying mail to the mailboxes,” he writes. “It was the salt-of-the-earth types like my unknown angel in Michigan who actually wrote the letters.”

Yes, Mike Huckabee is a different kind of Republican, after doing a number on Arkansas, he moved to Florida where there is no State Income Tax.  Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin and Glenn Beck have spent hours exposing Governor Huckabee, is anybody listening?

Presidents Plan to Soak the Rich 101

July 10, 2012

This will take more than a sound bite. Have you heard of the Bush Tax Cuts? In 2001 George Bush began cutting taxes across the board including Capital Gains Taxes. Nine months into the Bush Presidency the Attacks of 9/11 occurred.

George Bush was not my favorite President, I am a Reagan man and, of course, George Washington. Bush was too much of a big government, big spender to suit me. His policies were too intrusive into privacy to suit me also.

Nevertheless, George was 10 times the President that President Obama is. The average unemployment rate during the Bush 8 years was 5.26%. That is better than the best year Reagan had, not to mention Obama’s dismal record.

From day one Obama has sounded like a broken record in an unrelenting pursuit to eliminate the Bush Tax Cuts. With the November Election looming, Obama’s desire to raise taxes is evolving to just affect the so called rich, those earning $250,000 a year.

If Congress would give him what he asks for, his brilliant plan would raise enough revenue to pay the interest on the National Debt for a week. Of course that would be wiped out by the Obamacare Tax and it hits those earning less than $120,000 the worst.

The so called rich are mostly small business owners. Raising taxes affects them, of course, but it affects much more than them. The owners have expenses; to wit utilities, labor, taxes, fees, materials, etc. In the old days if expenses went up a businessman could simply raise prices. Back then all the competitors would have to raise their prices too. Not so now, 70% of the automobiles sold in the U.S. are manufactured overseas. America now has the highest Corporate Tax in the World. In addition, Unions, EPA & OSHA Regulations, Drilling Policy, etc have put American Business at a disadvantage to virtually every other Country in the World.

Therefore, raising prices is a slippery slope that could lead to bankruptcy. Businessmen would have to look at other options such as not hiring new employees, laying off employees, cutting wages, not buying new equipment, downsizing, retiring and trying to sell the business, etc. All of these decisions affect other people and other suppliers. Some businesses might opt to move overseas.

While the Obama plan to soak the filthy rich may appeal to his base, there is more to it than meets the eye. Let’s take doctors for example. There is a shortage of doctors and as a result as many as ten percent delay retirement because it would put other doctors in dire straits or it would leave a community without a urologist or other specialist. Raise their taxes and they WILL retire. They’re not stupid. I think you get the point of where this will take America.